Do you obey rules?
Why or why not?
What about the children you know – yours or others’?
Continuing on the trajectory that began in my next-to-last
post about boundaries, we now turn to those more concrete, explicit boundaries
known as “rules.”
Figure I: Chart of Obedience
This chart describes some of the main ways individuals react
to rules.
People may obey rules out of a sense of justice or fear or
respect. They may do so for the sake of appearances -- or because it has not
occurred to them to do otherwise. People may disobey rules because they are not
aware of them – or are aware and simply do not care. Or they may do so because
they are rebellious and see rules as made to be broken. They may enjoy being
sneaky, or feel that they need to be sneaky in order to do what they want to
do. In this chart, the motives of
justice and injustice meet on the spectrum, as do two expressions of apathy.
Finding ways to help my Full Spectrum household follow those
rules I deem important has been an ongoing challenge. In fact, when I consider
getting my children to obey rules, the classic notion of “herding cats” comes
to mind. G cares deeply about justice and will sometimes follow rules for this
reason, but he tends toward the “Lack of Awareness/Who Cares?” quadrant of my
chart. Z typically obeys rules for
the sake of appearances or out of fear or respect, while having a very strong
propensity toward sneakiness and rebellion. I’ve yet to determine if, for Z,
defiance is based on a feeling of injustice.
In basic societal terms, it seems that G wants to be “good,” and is sometimes unable to figure out how,
while Z seems to want to be “bad,” and is only sometimes successful due to
constrictions which force her to act
“good.” Obviously this is an oversimplification, and not language I would ever actively use in parenting, but it does reflect how I
often feel as we try to navigate the world of rules as a family.
I was fortunate to encounter my parenting idol, Xiao Chuan
Ayi (Auntie [given Chinese name]), when G was but a lad of two. Xiao Chuan Ayi is unflappable, serene,
as stable as I have always been high strung. And she has two brilliant, active sons.
Her standard admonition is very simple: “You know what? That
is not safe [or kind or polite or…],” said with great poise and tranquility and
authority. Her boys could be breaking all sorts of rules -- swinging from a
chandelier with machetes, making war cries and sprinkling those below with
water balloons -- and, with a word and a Special Look from their mother, they
are standing at attention. On the ground! She would surely argue that they
don’t get off the chandelier immediately 100% of the time but, trust me, they
listen more than most.
Following the
admirable Xiao Chuan Ayi, “You know what? “ became my earliest go-to phrase.
“You know what? That is not safe/kind/polite/[fill-in-the-blank]…” was a
relatively effective way to at least communicate rules and boundaries. if not to actually enact them in each instance.
The problem was and remains that I have neither what Xiao
Chuan Ayi terms, “The Chinese Look of Death,” nor its Whitey McWhiterson
equivalent.
“What if I got angry?” my demeanor and past conduct seem to
say to my kids, “Oh yeah? Well…What if I-I-I…raised my voice to a fairly loud
volume and then told you, um, you couldn’t have any dessert but, uh, you could
certainly have some blueberries with a teensy bit of Hershey’s syrup on them?
Huh? Huh??? What then!”
Very threatening.
“You know what?” Infractions in areas I really care about –
kindness, respect, safety – may call my Full Spectrum of Doom down upon my
chilluns. In those instances I am able to invoke a fearsome aspect of myself
without, indeed, really even trying. I just – some stuff I just don’t care about,
even though I am supposed to.
Sure, I would like my children to know how to properly set a table. I have a hard time, however, mustering
obedience-ensuring wrath over a fork in the wrong place.
But I should not imply that my friend rules through fear. To
be clear, Xiao Chuan Ayi’s Chinese Look of Death may be most remarkable in how
unnecessary it is -- because the woman just exudes calm. To wit, G, Z and I
were recently at her house on a lovely summer morning and, through a series of
stomach-related mishaps, managed to cover her entire bathroom floor (heck, her
entire bathroom) in diarrhea. After cracking up big time (now that’s a good friend), she whisked G and Z away so I could
deal with the disastrophe at hand.
While I scrubbed away upstairs, the children – those same
children who had not stopped flapping their jibs for the first three weeks of
July -- stayed downstairs with their Ayi, quietly entertaining themselves. As I attempted at length to restore my
dear friend’s bathroom to some semblance of cleanliness, not a peep was to be
heard. Meanwhile, Xiao Chuan Ayi was…accomplishing things!
Or consider G’s kindergarten teacher, Mrs S.* Mrs. S is of
small stature and looks like a stereotypical blonde angel. She is gentle, kind
and quiet. Yet she was in complete control of a classroom that consisted of
eleven rambunctious boys and two girls. Imagine the boy-filled,
first-time-in-school chaos, and the tiny teacher in its midst. Yet: “Now girls
and boys,” she would say softly, and the Entire Room would Instantly hush!
News flash: that type of gentle admonition leading to thrall
does not often happen in our household, despite a much more favorable
child-to-adult ratio.
Sometimes kids don’t listen. As parents, we must choose our
battles. One task, then, is deciding which rules matter to us. The second is
figuring out how to convey their importance in a way that makes sense, so that
our rules are clear, just, fair and compelling. Then we try to follow through with consistency and
regularity. If we can begin to do
so with the inner authority and peaceful mien of a Xiao Chuan Ayi or a Mrs. S,
so much the better.
I’ve heard tell my paternal grandmother (who taught first
grade) had this gift, but such subtleties do not come naturally to me. From
where I stand on the spectrum, rules that are just and good are meant to be
followed and those that are not just and good are to be disregarded. Simple.
Explaining why this is so feels alien.
Modes of enforcing rules seem either mysteriously subtle or
ham-handed or violent. Also,
ineffective: yelling, exhortation, protracted explanations and dire
consequences all have little impact given Z and G’s Spectrum locales. The way
they handle rules could ultimately affect their overall well-being and chances
of success in life, ergo, the need to cultivate new approaches.
The gentle authority of teachers like Xiao Chuan Ayi, Mrs.
S, and my Grammy seems a tricky, elusive, extremely worthwhile art, and certainly
one to which I aspire.
Subtly!!!
Love,
Full Spectrum Mama
* Mrs. S will be Z’s first grade teacher in the fall, and
her placid, earthy solidity promises to be a great match for X’s
mountain-moving attempts.
